March Market Insights: Hardware vs. Software
Written by: Edward Wilhelm
A familiar pattern continued to emerge in markets this February. Companies building the infrastructure of artificial intelligence (AI) continue to post remarkable numbers, while companies building software on top of that infrastructure are navigating a more uncertain moment.
The tension between AI hardware and software companies came into sharper focus last month, and it carries real implications for investors thinking about the AI trade.
NVIDIA Sets the Bar. Again.
NVIDIA reported fourth-quarter results last week that were, by any measure, stellar. Revenue reached $68 billion for the quarter, up 73% from a year ago, and the company guided its next quarter to $78 billion, far ahead of Wall Street's $72 billion estimate.
For the full year, NVIDIA generated nearly $216 billion in revenue.
The hyperscalers are on pace to collectively spend almost $700 billion on AI infrastructure this year, and that demand flows directly to companies supplying the hardware powering artificial intelligence.
Yet the stock dropped roughly 5% the day after earnings. It was a somewhat puzzling moment that reminds us just how high expectations are. The stock price, at any given moment, reflects what the market already believes.
Software's Uncomfortable February
The contrast with the software sector this month has been stark.
The iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF (IGV), which holds companies like Salesforce (CRM), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), and Intuit (INTU), fell more than 20% in February alone.
The pressure isn’t coming from slowing growth or rising rates. Instead, it is coming from advances in artificial intelligence itself.
Anthropic released two major model upgrades this month. Claude Opus 4.6 added the ability to coordinate multiple AI agents simultaneously across complex professional tasks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 followed, bringing dramatically improved computer-use abilities.
OpenAI continued pushing forward as well.
The market is doing the math: if an AI agent can draft a slide deck, process invoices, manage a workflow, and review code, then the platforms selling those capabilities as separate subscriptions may face genuine pressure. That pressure shows up in earnings guidance and in how investors are pricing the sector.
The Age of Agentic AI: Capability and Caution
The term dominating AI conversations last month was agentic AI.
An AI agent does not just answer a question. It takes action on your behalf, inside your systems, with real consequences. The shift from AI as a tool you interact with to AI as a system that acts independently is one of the most significant developments in artificial intelligence’s short history.
Nothing illustrated the risks of that shift more vividly than a story that went viral last month.
Summer Yue, the Director of AI Alignment at Meta’s Superintelligence Labs, connected an open-source AI agent called OpenClaw to her work email to help organize it.
She gave it clear instructions: do not take any action without her explicit approval.
The agent acknowledged the instruction, then ignored it.
OpenClaw began deleting her entire inbox. She sent commands to stop from her phone, but the agent continued. The only intervention that worked was physically running to her computer and unplugging it.
Her post on the incident drew nearly ten million views, and she later called it a “rookie mistake.”
The irony is hard to miss. The person responsible for keeping AI systems aligned temporarily lost control of her own AI agent.
But the broader implication matters more than the irony.
According to a recent industry report, 81% of organizations have deployed AI agents past the planning phase, while fewer than 15% have full security approval for those deployments.
The technology is moving faster than the governance frameworks built to contain it.
That is not a reason to avoid AI exposure in an investment portfolio, but it is a reason to be thoughtful about which companies are building responsibly versus which ones are simply building fast.
What This Means for Investors
The AI infrastructure buildout remains robust, and NVIDIA’s results confirm it. Hyperscaler capital expenditure plans reinforce it further.
That part of the story remains intact.
This infrastructure story is also personal to how we manage portfolios. Our position in SMH, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, is grounded in the idea that when the world’s largest companies are competing to spend more on AI each quarter, the companies enabling that computing power tend to benefit in a durable way.
On the software side, the picture is more selective.
Some platforms will successfully integrate artificial intelligence and retain their value to customers. Others may be displaced.
February was a reminder that the most powerful technologies tend to create opportunity and disruption in equal measure.
As always, if you have questions about how these developments may affect your portfolio, please contact an advisor. We are watching these trends closely and are happy to discuss your specific situation.
Explore more market insights from Bouchey Financial Group:
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Please remember that past performance is no guarantee of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Bouchey Financial Group, Ltd. [“Bouchey Financial”]), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, no portion of this discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Bouchey Financial. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Neither Bouchey Financial’s investment adviser registration status, nor any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed that a certain level of results or satisfaction will be achieved if Bouchey Financial is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Bouchey Financial is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Bouchey Financial’s current written disclosure Brochure and Form CRS discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request or at www.bouchey.com. Please Note: Bouchey Financial does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Bouchey Financial’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please Remember: If you are a Bouchey Financial client, please contact Bouchey Financial, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. Unless, and until, you notify us, in writing, to the contrary, we shall continue to provide services as we do currently. Please Also Remember to advise us if you have not been receiving account statements (at least quarterly) from the account custodian.